🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Across Europe, a growing number of states are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to pass a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," stated a leading MEP driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has kept open a possible ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are secure and suitable for young users," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is largely happening at the local level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve safety.

While this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that governments globally are no longer content to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.